We never got to discuss this so I am making a thread so if you have not read the last book then stop reading. I have no sympathy for those who have not read it yet.
SNAPE is a bad guy, but a bad guy who is on Harry's side
Now discusss
The office Harry Potter Thread...(Last Book Stuff)
Moderator: Admin
The office Harry Potter Thread...(Last Book Stuff)
Chris
I be one of the gamemasters so e-mail me questions if you have them
I be one of the gamemasters so e-mail me questions if you have them
Okay.. I thought you ment the last book in the series. I see now that you are reffering to The Half-Blood Prince (snickers at Matt).
Yes, I wasn't suprised as to who was going to die in the book, but I didn't want to believe who did it. I still don't.
Though Harry says he's not going to return to Hogwarts for the last year, I'm betting he gets persuaded to go back.
Yes, I wasn't suprised as to who was going to die in the book, but I didn't want to believe who did it. I still don't.
Though Harry says he's not going to return to Hogwarts for the last year, I'm betting he gets persuaded to go back.
- Kalphoenix
- Town Member
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:45 pm
It's been awhile since I read it, so my grasp on the little details may be rusty. Plus, as we all know, I am oblivious, so I always miss things...
I personally think there was more to it than Snape just flat out killing Dumbledore. I mean, yes, Dumbledore is dead, without a doubt. But if you look at the end of the book, Snape was in good position to either kill or capture Harry and didn't do either, especially after Harry accused him of being a coward. Snape was really upset by that comment. I think because Dumbledore was the only person who always trusted him and it took a lot for him to carry out the plan.
I think it was always a part of the plan that if Snape got put into that position, that he should kill Dumbledore. I just don't see Dumbledore as the begging type. I believe that repeately in the book Dumbledore consistantly said he was expendible.
And that's what I have to say about that. Lol.
I personally think there was more to it than Snape just flat out killing Dumbledore. I mean, yes, Dumbledore is dead, without a doubt. But if you look at the end of the book, Snape was in good position to either kill or capture Harry and didn't do either, especially after Harry accused him of being a coward. Snape was really upset by that comment. I think because Dumbledore was the only person who always trusted him and it took a lot for him to carry out the plan.
I think it was always a part of the plan that if Snape got put into that position, that he should kill Dumbledore. I just don't see Dumbledore as the begging type. I believe that repeately in the book Dumbledore consistantly said he was expendible.
And that's what I have to say about that. Lol.
Mike: For the majority of you, choosing to use a packet instead of a weapon is a hindrance because your aims suck.
Travis: Crap he is on to me.
Travis: Crap he is on to me.
- Talana Isilisurë
- Town Member
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:55 pm
- Location: The Town of Haven
- Contact:
- Kalphoenix
- Town Member
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:45 pm
Yeah, he's dead...it would be really cheap if he wasn't. A deus ex machina or however that goes...but I agree that he still may show up.
I like Snape...but I'm a freak I guess.
I like Snape...but I'm a freak I guess.
Mike: For the majority of you, choosing to use a packet instead of a weapon is a hindrance because your aims suck.
Travis: Crap he is on to me.
Travis: Crap he is on to me.