Some may have seen this before but heck..

Post by **GM_Chris** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:01 pm

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt

Crihs

Midnight · Post by **Midnight** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:42 am

Ok Chris, be honest... did you copy that from one of Nelkie's notes? Because, that looks like his spelling... no really, i'm serious!

Nelkie · Post by **Nelkie** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:43 pm

Hey, I'm not that bad, am I? It makes sense to me in my head, it just gets lost in translation when it is typed out.

Claude du Sinjin · Post by **Claude du Sinjin** » Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:43 pm

Yeah, thats messed up... I read that just fine. Freakin' weird...

Kels · Post by **Kels** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:18 pm

Thanx now my head herts.

Claude du Sinjin · Post by **Claude du Sinjin** » Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:34 am

Really, do you have a link to this study? I'm quite intertested in reading about this some more as I've found some people that have problems reading your statement, but not the issues you'd think they would. A link or pdf er sumthin would be great!